Kalendertermin

BEGIN:VCALENDAR VERSION:2.0 PRODID:-//TYPO3/NONSGML Calendar Base (cal) V1.11.1//EN METHOD:PUBLISH BEGIN:VEVENT UID:www.hhu.de_248_24753 DTSTAMP:20201116T115103 DTSTART:20201103T173000Z DTEND:20201103T191500Z CATEGORIES:Aus den Instituten, Forschungsseminar Theoretische Philosophie, Forschungsseminar SUMMARY:Prof. Sven Bernecker (Univ. Köln): Explaining Knowledge: An Abductivist Account DESCRIPTION:Institut für Philosophie Lehrstuhl für Theoretische Philosophie Im Rahmen des Forschungsseminars laden wir ein zum Vortrag von\r\n\r\nProf. Dr. Sven Bernecker (Univ. Köln)\r\n\r\nDienstag\, 03.11.2020 18:30 – 20:00 Uhr 25.31 HS 5K\r\n\r\nWichtiger Hinweis: Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns vorab (christian@phil.hhu.de)\, falls Sie nicht am Lehrstuhl für Theoretische Philosophie angestellt sind und am Vortrag teilnehmen möchten. Wir bestätigen dann die Möglichkeit Ihrer Teilnahme.\r\n\r\n"Explaining Knowledge. The Program of Knowledge-First Abductivism“ Abstract: The paper presents a novel abductivist account of knowledge: S knows that p if and only if (i) p is the best explanation for S’s truly believing that p upon using method M and basis B in context C or (ii) S believes that p by competently deducing p from known premises. Abductiv-ism and reliabilism differ chiefly in two respects. First\, reliabilism demands that the truth of p be appropriately related to the fact that S forms the belief that p. Abductivism\, by contrast\, is not in the business of explaining belief-formation. The issue is not whether p explains that S believes p but whether p is the best explanation for S’s belief that p being true. Second\, ab-ductivism does not require that the method M by which S truly believes that p be reliable. Ab-ductivism differs from other explanationist accounts of knowledge in that it does not assume a causal notion of explanation. The kind of explanation constitutive of knowledge is inference to the best explanation or abduction. The abductivist account of knowledge has a leg up on rival accounts because it is not only extensionally adequate by identifying all and only cases of knowledge but also lets us understand the nature of knowledge. Among the features of ab-ductivism three stand out. First\, abductivism can handle the problem cases of both local and global method reliabilism. Second\, it yields a criterion for differentiating between falsehood-involving Gettier cases and cases of knowledge from falsehood. Third\, it provides an elegant explanation of the lottery intuition.\r\n\r\nSpeaker: Sven Bernecker is Humboldt Professor of Philosophy at the University of Cologne and Profes-sor of Philosophy at the University of California\, Irvine. His main areas of research are epis-temology\, metaphysics\, and philosophy of mind\, and he has published numerous articles in these areas. He is the author of Reading Epistemology (Blackwell\, 2006)\, The Metaphysics of Memory (Springer\, 2008)\, and Memory: A Philosophical Study (OUP\, 2010). He is the co-editor of Knowledge: Readings in Contemporary Epistemology (OUP\, 2000)\, Routledge Companion to Epistemology (2011)\, Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Memory (2017)\, Medical Knowledge in a Social World (Synthese\, 2019)\, and The Epistemology of Fake News (OUP\, 2021). ORGANIZER;CN="Institut für Theoretische Philosophie": END:VEVENT END:VCALENDAR